- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:16:52 -0600
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 15:34 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote: > What happens if an information resource has more than one XML > representation? > > > In http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec revision 1.160 > > It states: > > S1 > [[ > If an information resource IR is represented by an XML document whose > root node is linked to a GRDDL transformation TX, then TX is a GRDDL > transformation of IR. > ]] > > And S2 > > [[ > If an information resource IR has a GRDDL transformation whose > transformation property TP, applied to the XML root node from a > representation of IR, gives an RDF Graph G, then G is a GRDDL result of > IR. > ]] > > Consider IR1 which has two XML represenations XML-svg and XML-xhtml. > > The root node of XML-svg is linked to the GRDDL transformat t-svg and so > t-svg is a GRDDL transformation of IR. (S1) > > The root node of XML-xhtml is linked to the GRDDL transformation t-xhtml > and so t-xhtml is a GRDDL transformation of IR. (S1) > > If t-xhtml applied to the root node of XML-svg produces and RDF graph > G-svg-xhtml, then G-svg-xhtml is a GRDDL result of IR1. (S2) Correct. Both are GRDDL results of IR1. > I think this is an error. Transformations have to be linked to > representations not information resources I disagree. I think this is an excellent test case sketch. I hope to flesh it out presently; bonus points to anybody who beats me to it. > > Brian > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 17:17:08 UTC