- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:00:00 -0500
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
At 12:36 AM 11/7/2006 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > >[[ > > >If an information resource IR has an XML representation whose root > > >element has a namespace name NS and for any TX, the resource identified > > >by NS has a GRDDL result that is the merge of { ?NSDOC > > ><http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#namespaceTransformation> ?TX } with > > >any other RDF graphs, then TX is a GRDDL transformation of IR > > >]] > > > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#ns-bind > > > 1.150 2006/11/05 08:56:53 Maybe it's just me, in which case I'll gladly step aside and let others do the heavy lifting, but I still can't follow the statement above. 1) If an information resource IR has an XML representation whose root element has a namespace name NS I get this. We start with an XML document with a namespace NS declared on it. 2) and for any TX, Huh? Why "for any TX"? What does this mean? Aren't there a limited number of TXs that pertain to that NS? I don't understand this part. 3) the resource identified by NS has a GRDDL result Um. An NS has a GRDDL result IFF a namespaceTransformation has been nominated and that TX returns an RDF result. 4) that is the merge of { ?NSDOC <http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#namespaceTransformation> ?TX } That is the merge of its namespace Transformation 5) with any other RDF graphs, So the NS had a TX and its graph is a merge with some other RDF graph 6) then TX is a GRDDL transformation of IR I am lost again. How did this follow? I am not trying to be deliberately obtuse. I simply don't follow. Murray
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 17:09:45 UTC