- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:36:46 -0600
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 11:13 -0500, Murray Maloney wrote:
> At 03:09 AM 11/5/2006 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
>
> >I achieved fugue state again tonight and changed it.
>
> I hope you are feeling better soon.
Hmm... am I misusing the word? I thought it was a good thing...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugue_state suggests it means
amnesia... maybe I meant flow as in
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MentalStateCalledFlow
>
> >[[
> >If an information resource IR has an XML representation whose root
> >element has a namespace name NS and for any TX, the resource identified
> >by NS has a GRDDL result that is the merge of { ?NSDOC
> ><http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#namespaceTransformation> ?TX } with
> >any other RDF graphs, then TX is a GRDDL transformation of IR
> >]]
> > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#ns-bind
> > 1.150 2006/11/05 08:56:53
> >
> >The rules feel much sturdier now. I think this eliminates
> >the need for separate slides...
>
> Maybe it's the time of day, but that doesn't help me at all.
> I think that I might need several slides just to understand
> what is being said above.
OK, maybe slides are worthwhile after all. Hmm..
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 6 November 2006 03:36:59 UTC