- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 03:09:22 -0600
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 00:39 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 14:03 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 14:38 -0400, Ben Adida wrote: > > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > I think you missed a subtlety. > > > > Any GRDDL result of ?NSDOC is a result of ?D by the 1st bullet. > > > > > > So this means that you can declare a namespaceTransformation in the > > > instance document? I guess that doesn't hurt, but it's fairly confusing. > > > I'm not sure what the value of this generalized formalization is. > > > > I think there's a reason, but I'm not sure I remember it. > > I was in quite a fugue when I came up with this formulation, > > and I'm not sure I can return to that state this week. > > I hope I can explain it in due course. > > On second thought, I think you're right. But I'm not > sure yet, so I'm not going to change it just now. I achieved fugue state again tonight and changed it. [[ If an information resource IR has an XML representation whose root element has a namespace name NS and for any TX, the resource identified by NS has a GRDDL result that is the merge of { ?NSDOC <http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#namespaceTransformation> ?TX } with any other RDF graphs, then TX is a GRDDL transformation of IR ]] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#ns-bind 1.150 2006/11/05 08:56:53 The rules feel much sturdier now. I think this eliminates the need for separate slides... ACTION: DanC to prepare slides on grddl-rules.n3 Oh... and by way of... ACTION: DanC to create a "normative only" view of the GRDDL spec I have generated a formal/mechanical version of the rules: http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/grddl-rules3.n3 It's non-normative because it uses terms from XQuery functions and operators and from swap/cwm/n3 that I don't want GRDDL to depend on normatively. The prose rules don't depend on those; they only depend on XPath 1. I still intend to extract the normative-only view in due course. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 09:09:40 UTC