- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:46:30 -0600
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:27 -0500, Murray Maloney wrote: > At 11:56 AM 11/1/2006 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > As a data point, I asked cwm what it thinks, and it does [...] > >i.e. they answer "yes" to today's poll. > > Glad to hear that they agree. > > First, who is cwm? Oops... sorry I neglected to bind that to http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm ... [[ Cwm (pronounced coom) is a general-purpose data processor for the semantic web, somewhat like sed, awk, etc. for text files or XSLT for XML. It is a forward chaining reasoner which can be used for querying, checking, transforming and filtering information. Its core language is RDF, extended to include rules, and it uses RDF/XML or RDF/N3 (see Notation3 Primer) serializations as required. Cwm is written in python; it is part of SWAP, a Semantic Web Application Platform. It is open source under the W3C software license. ... Tim BL, with his director hat off ]] By design, it agrees with TimBL and me on matters of Web Architecture and Semantic Web Architecture. We maintain hundreds of cwm/N3 tests, and every once in a while we do a release which sorta certifies all of them. Any untested behavior of cwm is as likely to be a bug as a design feature, keep in mind. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 18:46:49 UTC