- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:35:32 -0600
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:56 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > As another data point, ... In today's telcon, I quoted... [[ The Internet media type / MIME type for RDF/XML is "application/rdf+xml" ]] -- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/ It's also relevant to consider the OWL precedent... [[ The Web Ontology Working Group has not requested a separate MIME type for OWL documents. Instead, we recommend to use the MIME type requested by the RDF Core Working Group, namely application/rdf+xml [RDF Concepts], or alternatively the XML MIME type application/xml. As file extension, we recommend to use either .rdf or .owl. ]] -- http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/ That results from one of my more thorough explanations of XML media types and namespaces... on media types for OWL (5.13) Date: 23 Oct 2002 15:57:53 -0500 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Oct/0162.html ... which is cited from http://esw.w3.org/topic/FollowYourNose Sorry for all the little teeny messages on this issue, but more stuff keeps occurring to me... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 18:36:18 UTC