- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:27:08 -0600
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 12:13 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> Brian sketched some tests a while ago...
>
> Grddl Squirrel 6 test cases
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Mar/0011.html
> I didn't really finish making the test case.
I think I got it working now.
The question is: if a document looks like RDF
(with a namespaceTransformation property) but is labelled
with content-type application/xml, does it have any (non-trivial)
GRDDL results?
My glean.py implementation currently says: no.
So that's what I put in the test suite, for now.
sq1-output.rdf is an empty graph.
<#sq1> a :Test;
dc:title "squirrel test 1 re namespace documents and media
types";
:description "squirrel test 1 re namespace documents and media
types";
:inputDocument <sq1.xml>;
:outputDocument <sq1-output.rdf>;
.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1.n3
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/sq1.xml
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/sq1-output.rdf
I added another test to sorta show why sq1 has
an empty result:
<#sq1a> a :Test;
dc:title "explain sq1 result: the namespace document has
no/empty GRDDL result";
:description "explain sq1 result: the namespace document has
no/empty GRDDL result";
:inputDocument <sq1ns.xml>;
:outputDocument <sq1-output.rdf>;
.
And another to show the non-squirrely case...
<#grddl_rdf> a :Test;
dc:title "for application/rdf+xml documents, the RDF/XML
reading is a grddl result";
:description "for application/rdf+xml documents, the RDF/XML
reading is a grddl result";
:inputDocument <projects.rdf>;
:outputDocument <projects.rdf>;
.
I think the spec doesn't actually say that yet.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 07:27:20 UTC