- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:27:08 -0600
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 12:13 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > Brian sketched some tests a while ago... > > Grddl Squirrel 6 test cases > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Mar/0011.html > I didn't really finish making the test case. I think I got it working now. The question is: if a document looks like RDF (with a namespaceTransformation property) but is labelled with content-type application/xml, does it have any (non-trivial) GRDDL results? My glean.py implementation currently says: no. So that's what I put in the test suite, for now. sq1-output.rdf is an empty graph. <#sq1> a :Test; dc:title "squirrel test 1 re namespace documents and media types"; :description "squirrel test 1 re namespace documents and media types"; :inputDocument <sq1.xml>; :outputDocument <sq1-output.rdf>; . http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1.n3 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/sq1.xml http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/sq1-output.rdf I added another test to sorta show why sq1 has an empty result: <#sq1a> a :Test; dc:title "explain sq1 result: the namespace document has no/empty GRDDL result"; :description "explain sq1 result: the namespace document has no/empty GRDDL result"; :inputDocument <sq1ns.xml>; :outputDocument <sq1-output.rdf>; . And another to show the non-squirrely case... <#grddl_rdf> a :Test; dc:title "for application/rdf+xml documents, the RDF/XML reading is a grddl result"; :description "for application/rdf+xml documents, the RDF/XML reading is a grddl result"; :inputDocument <projects.rdf>; :outputDocument <projects.rdf>; . I think the spec doesn't actually say that yet. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 07:27:20 UTC