- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:27:37 +0200
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ben Adida" <ben@mit.edu>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On 8/18/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 13:58 +0200, Danny Ayers wrote: > [...] > > My personal preference would be no attempts to standardise profile > > (and/or namespace)-free transformation itself, but recognition that it > > will happen, it may well be the majority case because of data quality > > realities. These transformation may or may not come under the umbrella > > of GRDDL. > > I much prefer that they don't come under the umbrella of GRDDL. > > Scraping is scraping, and GRDDL is not scraping. > > Let's leave it at that, shall we? Fine by me, so long as we're clear about it. This will mean pretty much any microformat-oriented demos right now will need instance data creating. Of the (likely thousands, possibly millions) of microformat docs on the web, here's a guestimate of those on Harry's list currently being GRDDLable: hCard : 1 (googled "http://www.w3.org/2006/03/hcard") hCalendar : 0 (couldn't find a profile URI) hReview : 0 (couldn't find a profile URI except the one I created, it doesn't look like I put the one example I made online) rel-tag : 0 (couldn't find a profile URI) rel-license : 0 (couldn't find a profile URI) However the XFN profile URI is widely used, some of the blogging tools (WordPress for one) include it by default. So I guess we could revive and refactor those old FOAF demos... Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 10:27:43 UTC