- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:05:51 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0608161402250.1716@joplin.bio.ri.ccf.org>
Note any fixes, replying to this message (be sure to CC public-grddl-wg@w3.org The HTML is attached, plain text is below: W3C - DRAFT - GRDDL Working Group Meeting Aug 16 2006 16 Aug 2006 Agenda See also: IRC log Attendees Present DanC, FabienGandon, bwm, chimezie, HarryH, +1.314.480.aacc, Brians, [IPcaller] Regrets Rachael, BenA, Ian Chair HarryH Scribe Chime Contents * Topics 1. Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-08-16T15:00Z 2. Finding Best Time for Re-occuring Meetings 3. Use Cases, scenario gallery * Summary of Action Items Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-08-16T15:00Z <DanC> Regrets BenA <DanC> GRDDL Working Group 2006-08-09 minutes <HarryH> Approve meeting minutes? RESOLUTION: Prior meeting minutes approved Finding Best Time for Re-occuring Meetings <DanC> considering 1600Z, noon ET HarryH: Would noon work for people? <DanC> PROPOSED: to meet again Wed, 23 Aug at 12pET unless WG members object by email, in which case we'll use 11am ET RESOLUTION: to meet again Wed, 23 Aug at 12pET unless WG members object by email, in which case we'll use 11am ET Use Cases, scenario gallery HarryH: Too many usecases <FabienGandon> here: http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/scenario-gallery.htm chimezie: Is it always the case to not have specifics in a usecase HarryH: Flesh out a bit more (4-5, perhaps) DanC: No audience for GRDDL usecase document DanC: break out usecase documents into specific audience FabienGandon: should be more formal in approach and flesh out usecases some more. <DanC> titles might be "getting data from HTML documents with GRDDL" and "Interoperable data with XML Schema with GRDDL" HarryH: is nervous about breaking it out <FabienGandon> Another example: OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/ <HarryH> believes Fabien has written the microformat use case document and is quite happy with it but wants 4-5 as opposed to 8-9 use cases. DanC: specific usecase generates creative commons metadata from OAI OAI? <DanC> http://www.openarchives.org/ <scribe> ACTION: Address XML schema GRDDL usecase (interested parties) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action01] chimezie: I think fewer usecases cover enough ground to make the general point HarryH: consolidate microformat usecases DanC: don't be too overzealous with consolidating usecases - focus on common scenarios <DanC> well, I'm happy to consolidate; but I want to consolidate based on audience and area of applicaiton, not based on technical mechanism <DanC> (I'm curious what Fabien uses to come up with such nice diagrams so quickly) FabienGandon: Target RDF vocabulary for Wikis could accomodate 1) general wiki structure 2) domain keywords FabienGandon: Better tagging of concepts. Dynamic reorganization by modifying underlying ontology associated with tagging semantics <danja> (facetted browsing?) <DanC> (hmm... I thought I grokked the wiki scenario, but with what chime said, I'm confused again.) chimezie: Using RDF to drive organization of content is sort of an inverse of GRDDL extraction of RDF vocabulary from content <HarryH> Thinks that we need to make the use cases simple and "for the people" as well as easy to implement. <FabienGandon> A longer version of the scenario on Wikis: ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/acacia/fgandon/research/semwiki2006/BuffaGandon_SemWiki2006.pdf <HarryH> Is very excited about the cutting-edge use cases but perhaps worried those may be over the head of some of our readers. <DanC> (I think I'm starting to get the XForms case, but it sounds pretty involved) <danja> (ref. for use case #3 - http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/blogs/gems/tech/rsd.html ) DanC: main motivation for whittling down usecases is to be able to elaborate on the ones we keep HarryH: Focus on advocacy as criteria for yes/no on usecases <scribe> ACTION: DanC as additional participant for usecase #1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action02] <scribe> ACTION: chimezie to help Fabien with usecase #2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action03] <DanC> I'm interested to mix #1, scheduling, with http://esw.w3.org/topic/SparqlCalendarDemo <scribe> ACTION: Fabien and danja interested in helping with XForms usecase [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action04] DanC: Hotel reviews instead of guitar review? More bootstrapping data <HarryH> definitely drop use case 7 - w3c index <scribe> ACTION: Consolidate Wiki usecase, querying usecase and e-learning usecase [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action05] <briansuda> moodle & k-12 <DanC> ACTION: DanC to relate some e-learning pointers, e.g. http://moodle.org/ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action06] <scribe> ACTION: Drop usecase 7 (Digital libraries and focused indices) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action07] FabienGandon: concerned about dropping usecase 7 - existing mechanism that can be improved <danja> (count me in as a fallback sponsor for wiki/catalogue/e-learning merger) FabienGandon: usecase titles shouldn't be too generic <scribe> ACTION: Drop validation / testing usecase [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08] <danja> (what he said - merge Atom/OWL into XForms) <scribe> ACTION: danja & chimezie work on merging Atom/OWL usecase into XForms usecase [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action09] <danja> live bookmarks - probably need to check with Elias ?( or was it Lee?) on possible scenarios <danja> I suggest tabling for now <danja> [4] & [9] look the same..? <danja> I missed discussion - isn't there mergeability with [1] and [6] <DanC> Fabien: I'm out next week. <DanC> ACTION: DanC to get CVS/ssh access for Fabien [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action10] <danja> I will, if no-one else jumps forward <DanC> (I also like mercurial/hg for decentralized version control, though I haven't deployed that in w3.org ) Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Harry carry XML schema GRDDL usecase to later meetings [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: DanC as additional participant for usecase #1, scheduling [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: chimezie to help Fabien with usecase #2 (Wiki usecase) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action03] [NEW] ACTION: danja, fabien to consolidate wiki usecase, queury usecase, and e-learning usecase [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action05] [NEW] ACTION: DanC to relate some e-learning pointers, e.g. http://moodle.org/ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action06] [NEW] ACTION: DanC and Fabien to elaborate W3C /TR/ case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action07] [NEW] ACTION: Fabien to drop validation / testing usecase [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08] [NEW] ACTION: danja & chimezie work on merging Atom/OWL usecase into XForms usecase [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/16-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action09] [End of minutes] Chimezie Ogbuji Lead Systems Analyst Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 Cleveland, Ohio 44195 Office: (216)444-8593 ogbujic@ccf.org
Attachments
- TEXT/PLAIN attachment: GRDDL Aug 16 minutes draft
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 18:06:03 UTC