- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:01:20 +0100
- To: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, dave@dajobe.org
- Message-ID: <4656C200.6070108@hpl.hp.com>
An informal note. Hi Dave just to let you know that the WG discussed your comment at our last meeting. While we are still checking, the consensus view seemed to be: a) no XSL parameters are defined during GRDDL processing b) that regards http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/soft/RDFa2RDFXML.xsl this is a feature not a bug! When used with a GRDDL processor, no parameter is specified, but the overall GRDDL rules specify the appropriate base URI to be used when turning the RDF/XML into triples. Other uses of the stylesheet include turning an XHTML document into a static RDF/XML document to be served from the same server. For this use then the url parameter can be used to give consistent results. This use lies outside the scope of GRDDL. c) we didn't discuss http://www.w3.org/2000/07/uri43/uri.xsl http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/home2rss.xsl My own view is that: - if they are intended as part of GRDDL transforms - if they require a parameter to be set then that is a bug with the stylesheet. i.e. not every stylesheet that converts HTML to RDF/XML is a GRDDL stylesheet. I tried running my GRDDL processor against http://www.w3.org/ and got the attached results, which do, in fact, differ from: http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/home.rss (the URI of the channel is different, as is the value of its link property. Note, the attached results are to be read with a base URI of http://www.w3.org/). This does suggest there are some related bugs in these stylesheets. (Despite this being an informal response to your comment, if it adequately addresses the comment, it would be helpful to let us know!) Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Attachments
- application/rdf+xml attachment: w3c.rdf
Received on Friday, 25 May 2007 11:02:19 UTC