- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:10:17 -0500
- To: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Cc: José Manuel Cantera Fonseca <jmcf@tid.es>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org
Elias Torres wrote: > In short, I don't think profile urls work because not everyone uses them > (point in case microformats). Therefore, to depend on it to find RDFa > would be misguided. There are other practical issues, such as limited > access authors/publishers that don't have control over the head section > of the page. This violates one of our principles of copy and paste/drag > and drop. It would require copying the profile and enabling on the page > you pasted it, hence making it more cumbersome that copy and paste alone. That explains why not rely on a profile, but it doesn't argue against providing one at all. > We have discussed this issue in the past so we should have it handy by > now why we don't have a standard profile (maybe in the FAQ??). I was advised to watch issue 28 when I asked a related question. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/28 It's evidently still open. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 19:10:43 UTC