- From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:08:46 +0100
- To: Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de
- CC: public-grddl-comments@w3.org
Hi Sven, Thanks for your comments. Any changes I mention are being made to the editor's draft at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer On 06/10/2006 08:23, Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de wrote: > Köln, Germany: Contains unreadable characters in print out > (probably the ö). > And Köln (instead of Cologne) is inconsistent with "Rome" > (which should be Roma then). I have changed this to Cologne. I agree that we should be consistent in the use of the names. I felt though, since the example is supposed to represent a real person's schedule and this person is using English to write the descriptions then the place names should also be Anglicised. > Normalized dates should better be uniform: > 2006-12-1 -> 2006-12-01 > 2006-12-5 -> 2006-12-05 > 2007-01-6 -> 2007-01-06 > 2007-01-8 -> 2007-01-08 I've changed these as you suggest. > > "Stephen" -> "Stephan" > > "collegue" -> "colleague" > > "can run queries can be run" -> "can run queries" > > "Authors'draft" -> "Authors' draft" All corrected in the editor's draft. > Dates in References: should follow ISO (not: 2006/08/30 and 2006/03/09). > The granularity of seconds might look too technical. > > And should not the "References" section be generated (e.g. with W3C > techniques :-) ) that avoid inconsistencies (like the use of "and" in > editor or author lists and initials)? Yes, absolutely. I plan to revise and tidy up the references section for the next draft. > > Greetings > Sven Ian
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 07:15:55 UTC