- From: <Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de>
- Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:23:24 +0200 (CEST)
- To: public-grddl-comments@w3.org
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 07:23:29 UTC
Dear authors. The primer seems to become a useful document. Thanks! Here are the minor problems I have seen while reading it (in reading order): Köln, Germany: Contains unreadable characters in print out (probably the ö). And Köln (instead of Cologne) is inconsistent with "Rome" (which should be Roma then). Normalized dates should better be uniform: 2006-12-1 -> 2006-12-01 2006-12-5 -> 2006-12-05 2007-01-6 -> 2007-01-06 2007-01-8 -> 2007-01-08 "Stephen" -> "Stephan" "collegue" -> "colleague" "can run queries can be run" -> "can run queries" "Authors'draft" -> "Authors' draft" Dates in References: should follow ISO (not: 2006/08/30 and 2006/03/09). The granularity of seconds might look too technical. And should not the "References" section be generated (e.g. with W3C techniques :-) ) that avoid inconsistencies (like the use of "and" in editor or author lists and initials)? Greetings Sven
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 07:23:29 UTC