- From: == J E M == <jem.rayfield@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:13:56 +0100
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-graphql-rdf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJJ75HtPJE0wtzOLD8BO9bf4vuDweMh1PTUkpUZDrUZnYXcX6w@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, So we don't have any vendor participation other than Ontotext. TopQuadrant is out and no messages incoming from Stardog. So, I think perhaps a standard driven just by Ontotext, would be.. less valuable. Anyway, if you disagree, let me know. Otherwise, I suspect a call would be wasting most peoples time, just now. Regards Jem Mobile: +44 (0)7957 341470 On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 00:09, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > We at TopQuadrant do have a GraphQL mapping based on SHACL in production > and it does seem to work well. At this stage, even if a group of other > implementers would come up with a generalized/standardized approach, I > don't think we would be able or willing to spend resources on changing our > implementation as this would break all client code including enterprise > customers. There would need to be some really significant benefits from > such a change. Having said this, a standard could lead to 3rd party > implementations which we could then integrate as an additional service > interface. > > I guess I'll stay on the side lines for now as the problem is already > solved for us, sorry. > > Holger > > https://www.topquadrant.com/technology/graphql/ > > > On 16/09/2020 21:02, Jem Rayfield wrote: > > OK, if you are interested in talking about GraphQL schema generation > (standards) from RDF please register your interest in a call using the > following doodle poll. > > https://doodle.com/poll/pu34n4kxadsz57ch > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:00 AM Ruben Taelman <ruben.taelman@ugent.be> > wrote: > >> > Sounds, good. How does one usually organise, such a call? >> >> I would suggest setting up a Doodle to determine a timeslot that works >> for most people. >> But I’m open to alternatives! >> >> For setting up the call, we should be able to request a one-time or >> recurring WebEx meeting via this: >> https://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/TeleconferenceHowTo.htm >> >> Kind regards, >> Ruben Taelman >> >> > On 16 Sep 2020, at 11:50, Jem Rayfield <jem.rayfield@ontotext.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > "Having a call might be a good first step to initiate this effort?" >> > >> > Sounds, good. How does one usually organise, such a call? >> > Sorry, I am a W3C group noob. >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:43 AM Ruben Taelman <ruben.taelman@ugent.be> >> wrote: >> > Hi Hem, >> > >> > > Does the group have an up to date list of GraphQL-RDF solutions, >> libraries, services etc? If not where can we start collating this >> information? >> > >> > We have a W3C GitHub repo where we are collecting things: >> > https://github.com/w3c/graphql-rdf/blob/master/docs/resources.md >> > >> > Feel free to send a PR if anything is missing from that list. >> > >> > > It would be good to start some analysis across the various >> GraphQL-RDF schema generation approaches to find common ground and >> divergence. >> > >> > +1 >> > Having a call might be a good first step to initiate this effort? >> > >> > >> > As mentioned on Twitter, I don’t have sufficient bandwidth at the >> moment to pull this effort on my own. >> > I’m however happy to help anyone who would have more time to pull this. >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > Ruben Taelman >> > >> > > On 16 Sep 2020, at 11:26, Jem Rayfield <jem.rayfield@ontotext.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > Does the group have an up to date list of GraphQL-RDF solutions, >> libraries, services etc? If not where can we start collating this >> information? >> > > >> > > Also, could we perhaps get Rubens paper updated? >> > > >> > > It would be good to start some analysis across the various >> GraphQL-RDF schema generation approaches to find common ground and >> divergence. >> > > >> > > Let me know how I can help, with the effort >> > > >> > > Cheers >> > > -- >> > > Jem Rayfield >> > > Chief Architect >> > > Ontotext AD >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Jem Rayfield >> > Chief Architect >> > Ontotext AD >> >> > > -- > Jem Rayfield > Chief Architect > Ontotext AD > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2020 09:14:48 UTC