- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 16:31:32 +0100
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, "Maali, Fadi" <fadi.maali@deri.org>, bernard vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche <py.vandenbussche@gmail.com>, Diederik Tirry <Diederik.Tirry@sadl.kuleuven.be>
> On 21 Sep 2013, at 09:10, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > - I considered duplicating the English language labels and comments without language tags but decided against - what are other people's views on this? I agree with your decision. > - The turtle retains all the terms from previous versions but the labels and comments all indicate that they are now deprecated. Should we add machine-readable statuses to terms? If so, how? I know of two ways: using http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#term_status which is in line with FOAF/VOAF and takes a literal, or using ADMS which takes a skos:Concept. Does it make sense to add a status of 'deprecated' to some terms and not 'stable' to others? dcat:Xxx owl:deprecated true. This can be used on resources of any kind, not just classes or properties. Best, Richard > - I put in a load of metadata about creators and contributors - it could probably do with cleaning up/being done in a more consistent manner. Advice welcome. > > > As you might imagine, from my POV this is about more than DCAT - this is about thinking about how we should do this for vocabs in /ns space in general. > > Phil. > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C eGovernment > http://www.w3.org/egov/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > <dcat.ttl>
Received on Saturday, 21 September 2013 15:31:58 UTC