- From: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:39:15 +0000
- To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- CC: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, "Government Linked Data Working Group" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi Ghislain, Good question but difficult to answer. Indeed, in the QB-UC document [1] we mainly describe use cases that were possible to be implemented with QB. We show that QB shall be broadly applicable. It depends a little on what you mean with "given dataset". If you mean multi-dimensional data (e.g., as defined by SDMX), I think, you should be able to at least partly represent any dataset using QB. Of course, there are things that cannot be represented with QB, e.g., aggregation functions, certain hierarchical relationships, provenance information and more general dataset metadata. In those cases, QB can be complemented by other vocabularies (e.g., DCAT, VoiD, COGS, PROV, QB4OLAP, SKOS, XKOS). I hope that helps. Best, Benedikt [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-vocab-data-cube-use-cases-20130801/> ________________________________________ Von: Ghislain Atemezing [auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. August 2013 10:36 An: Benedikt Kaempgen Cc: Dave Reynolds; Government Linked Data Working Group Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [QB-UCR] Review comments Hi Benedikt, all > Does anyone else (Phil, Richard,...) still have comments to the QB-UC document [1]? > Regarding QB/QB-UC and Best Practices, could it be possible to help the publishers to know whether a given dataset *can not * be model using Data Cube? Or is there any pointer? TIA Ghislain -- Ghislain Atemezing EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department Campus SophiaTech 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 08:39:49 UTC