RE: Resolving DCAT/ADMS Versioning (was Re: Naive question on DCAT versioning) from Makx Dekkers on 2013-10-30 (public-gld-wg@w3.org from October 2013)

From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:07:23 +0100
To: "'Richard Cyganiak'" <richard@cyganiak.de>, "'Phil Archer'" <phila@w3.org>
Cc: "'Ghislain Atemezing'" <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>, "'Antoine Isaac'" <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "'Public GLD WG'" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000901ced568$99c71800$cd554800$@makxdekkers.com>

Richard,

> It also seems to
> imply that a new version is not a modification, which I find bizarre.

The way I look at it, a new version is never a modification of the old
version. A new version may be created (e.g. at URI-2) as a derivation of
the old version but it does not change that version (e.g. at URI-1).

Depends on your perspective. Therefore, I think it is going to be useful
to talk in more detail about the various mental and practical models
that versioning is trying to cover.

I do agree with you that Phil's second sentence should not be included.

Makx.

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 12:07:56 UTC