Re: dcat next steps

+1 

Thank you all.

Cheers,
Bernadette


On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> On 10/24/2013 06:35 PM, Fadi Maali wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> Thanks Hadley and all.
> 
> Indeed, thank you Hadley!!
> 
>> I am so sorry to miss yesterday telco but suffering from a bad jet lag.
> 
> I hope you feel better soon!
> 
> Especially since there are a few things we need to do that I think you're best able to do.   Top of the list is to actually respond to each of the comments people sent in about dcat during LC2.   As I imagine you know, there are a few to which it appears no reply was sent [1].     We really should have sent replies, made any necessary edits, and gotten confirmation from the commenters that they are satisfied with the response BEFORE we voted as we did today. Anyway -- at this point, we just need to take care of this as soon as possible, and definitely within the next week.  Since commenters may be slow to respond, it was be best of we can get responses out to them in the next day or two.
> 
> The editor's draft also needs a "Changes Since Second Last Call" section, (so far it's just "specialist" in the first sentence).  If you need to make any changes to address comments, they should be noted there.   Obviously we don't want a lot of changes to the draft at this point, but editorial changes (ones which wouldn't actually affect any implementations) are okay.    (And we'll want to give WG members a couple of days to make sure they're comfortable with those before we publish.)
> 
>      -- Sandro
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_LC_comments
> 
>> Regards,
>> Fadi
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> Fadi Maali
>> PhD student @ Insight Galway (formerly DERI)
>> Irish Research Council Embark Scholarship holder
>> http://www.deri.ie/users/fadi-maali
>> 
>> On 25 Oct 2013, at 09:42, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> In today's meeting, we voted to transition DCAT to Candidate Rec.  [1]
>>> 
>>> Because the transition vote wasn't on the agenda for today's meeting to give you advance warning of the vote, we wanted to check with those of you who didn't attend.
>>> 
>>> IN THE NEXT 24 HOURS, could you please respond to the group and tell us if you support the resolution, below?  (A reply saying "+1" would be sufficient.)
>>> 
>>>     RESOLUTION:  Advance DCAT to Candidate Recommendation, with the exit criteria of each term in the dcat namespace being properly used by two or more data sources. [1]
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance for your help on this!
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>>   Hadley
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hadley Beeman
>>> Co-chair
>>> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group
>>> 
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-10-24#resolution_1
>> 
>> 
> 
>