Re: Today's transition resolution: DCAT to Candidate Rec

+1

On 25 October 2013 09:38, Biplav Srivastava <sbiplav@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> Regards,
> --Biplav
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   From:       Chris Beer <chris@codex.net.au>
>
>   To:         Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>
>
>   Cc:         GLD Chairs <team-gld-chairs@w3.org>
>
>   Date:       25/10/2013 06:02 AM
>
>   Subject:    RE: Today's transition resolution:  DCAT to Candidate Rec
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +1
>
> Chris Beer
> Australia
>
> ---- Hadley Beeman wrote ----
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In today's meeting, we voted to transition DCAT to Candidate Rec.  [1]
>>
>> Because the transition vote wasn't on the agenda for today's meeting to
> give you advance warning of the vote, we wanted to check with those of you
> who didn't attend.
>>
>> IN THE NEXT 24 HOURS, could you please respond to the group and tell us
> if you support the resolution, below?  (A reply saying "+1" would be
> sufficient.)
>>
>>      RESOLUTION:  Advance DCAT to Candidate Recommendation, with the exit
> criteria of each term in the dcat namespace being properly used by two or
> more data sources. [1]
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your help on this!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>    Hadley
>>
>>
>> Hadley Beeman
>> Co-chair
>> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-10-24#resolution_1
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 06:53:11 UTC