- From: Boris Marcelo Villazon Terrazas <boris.villazon.terrazas@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:36:25 +0200
- To: Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>
- Cc: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ9EsGL50zs-=opJ-ehM+3ucozH+HdmMBB=AzGrZPKTeJyiouQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Hadley, all Regrets for tomorrow's telecon. Regarding point 4. We did some improvements with Ghis during summer. Ghis?, Bernadette? Best Boris On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > It's been a while — we're due for a catch-up. Hope you (especially > editors!) can join us for a meeting tomorrow. > > Given the amount of time left in our extension, I'd like us to move back > to weekly meetings again. They may be brief, but I want to make sure we > are supporting our editors and reviewers and much as possible as we near > the finish. > > Looking forward to speaking tomorrow! > > Cheers, > > Hadley > > Main agenda (copied from the Wiki): [1] > > Status update: > > For each deliverable, please be ready to talk about: > > - where you are at the moment and what you've accomplished since our > last call > - what you need from the working group to resolve your work - ideally > in the next two months. > > > 1. DCAT - results of second last call, work to be done to get to > Recommendation. Is it still a priority for the working group to get his to > Rec, or is working group note more feasible? > 2. Data Cube - how is it going with CR? Path to PR? > 3. ORG - how is it going with CR? Path to PR? > 4. Best practices - do we have text to review? If not, what is the > timetable to get a thorough note written and reviewed in the next two > months? Or is this no longer a priority for the working group? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20131017 >
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 22:36:53 UTC