- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:34:46 +0000
- To: João Paulo Almeida <jpandradealmeida@gmail.com>, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Dave, João Paulo, I see no reason why a diagram cannot be replaced with a better one. That's just an editorial, not a substantive, change. Phil On 21/11/2013 10:27, João Paulo Almeida wrote: > We should remind the colleagues that the diagram is non-normative. So, we could say it does not alter the content of the recommendation itself. > > I believe the diagram has good value to improve the understandability of the work, so this is why I hope it can be incorporated in the text, as it should help the recommendation to have higher impact, > > Regards, > > João Paulo > > >> On 21/11/2013, at 08:16, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> In a separate thread Phil mentioned "At CR very little can be changed". >> >> One clarification question on that. >> >> For ORG João Paulo produced an improve UML diagram [1] which didn't make it into the CR document. Will it be OK to change the diagram at the transition to PR to use João Paulo's? >> >> Dave >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Oct/0014.html >> > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 10:35:20 UTC