W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: linked data standards (re Linked Data Glossary)

From: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:31:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC1Gg8SO3Rkb+NRHoMhKmc9CMUUOvPEvQ67+0_NLwz=JEqzXzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>, public-gld-wg@w3.org, Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 07:40 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>
> ...
> Second, N3 is a not a standard so shouldn't be in that list of standards.
>
> Thirdly, N-Triples was originally designed for test cases and not a
> normative format for interchange. That is probably changing (I'm not
> following RDF 1.1) so I guess I don't really object to that being in there.
>
> Indeed, I think the key RDF standards are probably  RDF/XML, RDFa, Turtle,
> and SPARQL.   (N3 and N-Triples do not belong on that list.)    Turtle isn't
> a REC yet, but I expect it will be soon.   JSON-LD isn't probably right to
> list yet.

How about referring to this suite as "RDF standards, draft
recommendations and other community-supported mechanisms for
expressing data as RDF?"


-- 
John S. Erickson, Ph.D.
Director, Web Science Operations
Tetherless World Constellation (RPI)
<http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com>
Twitter & Skype: olyerickson
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 15:32:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:06 UTC