- From: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:31:47 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>, public-gld-wg@w3.org, Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > On 03/20/2013 07:40 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > > ... > Second, N3 is a not a standard so shouldn't be in that list of standards. > > Thirdly, N-Triples was originally designed for test cases and not a > normative format for interchange. That is probably changing (I'm not > following RDF 1.1) so I guess I don't really object to that being in there. > > Indeed, I think the key RDF standards are probably RDF/XML, RDFa, Turtle, > and SPARQL. (N3 and N-Triples do not belong on that list.) Turtle isn't > a REC yet, but I expect it will be soon. JSON-LD isn't probably right to > list yet. How about referring to this suite as "RDF standards, draft recommendations and other community-supported mechanisms for expressing data as RDF?" -- John S. Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Web Science Operations Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> Twitter & Skype: olyerickson
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 15:32:19 UTC