- From: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:19:33 -0400
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, public-gld-wg@w3.org
Hi Guys! > Let me clarify that the current spec *does not* include anything like dcat:permanentIdentifier Okay... > Some time ago, I proposed adding such a property, as it seems important. That's ISSUE-14. But since it appeared that we couldn't get consensus, and in the interest of moving forward, I now proposed to POSTPONE the issue, in other words, do nothing. > > Phil, you seem to be hating dcat:permanentIdentifier, but also give a -1 to my proposal of doing nothing? > > John, you say that you agree with Phil, but it sounds like you actually *want* dcat:permanentIdentifier? Sorry; I was confused as to the root objection. I thought PhilA was arguing for keeping it, not arguing against doing something (I was arguing for doing something). > John, just *how much* do you want it? I read this as saying that you will formally object to DCAT moving forward, unless we add dcat:permanentIdentifier? dcat:permanentIdentifier is semantic sugar that might be nice but is not required (IMHO) to move forward. So I'm not highly motivated... > John, the spec *does* point out the possibility of using dc:identifier (with a literal value), which I think is sufficient for DOIs etc. +1 to this, and I am happy with this. Furthermore, I do not see anything restricting multiple instances of dc:identifier, a fact which accommodates multiple identifiers. Ship it without dcat:permanentIdentifier ... > > Best, > Richard > > > On 8 Mar 2013, at 12:57, John Erickson wrote: > >> +1 to Phil's comments and -10 to dropping dcat:permanentIdentifier >> >> With the advent of DataCite DOIs and other PIDs for scientific data >> including EPIC and (soon to be announced) DCO-IDs --- all based on the >> Handle System --- and with the emerging application of DCAT to >> research data management, I strongly endorse inclusion of a field for >> the PID. >> >> John >> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: >>> Instinctively I dislike this intensely. It encourages bad practice by >>> suggesting that identifiers for data sets should all be treated as ephemeral >>> except the special case of the dcat:permanentIdentifier. Gah! >>> >>> If you create a catalogue as an aggregate of other catalogues (like >>> publicdata.eu) then you jolly well SHOULD use the original URIs from the >>> original catalogue. If you don't/can't/won't, then at least have the decency >>> to include owl:sameAs links. >>> >>> As ever, I am aware that I take a purist view and that practicality can play >>> a trump card - meaning that if there are cases where the reason for wanting >>> permanentIdentifier is something a lot better than "we like the way we do it >>> so we're going to use our lovely foo.aspx?sessionID=claptrap" URIs but we >>> recognise that your well designed >>> http://{domain}/{type}/{concept}/{reference} URI might have something going >>> for it" then OK, I won't be intransigent - but I don't like it. >>> >>> So, -1 from me, but I remain open to persuasion if the evidence is there. >>> >>> Phil. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 08/03/2013 11:26, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >>>> >>>> There are two remaining issues on DCAT that we couldn't address in the >>>> telco. A Proposals for one of them is below. If you have any objection to >>>> the proposed course of action, please say so via email. >>>> >>>> >>>> ISSUE-14: add dcat:permanentIdentifier property >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/14 >>>> >>>> With some regret, I have to say: >>>> >>>> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-14, as there is no consensus on such a property. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Phil Archer >>> W3C eGovernment >>> >>> http://philarcher.org >>> +44 (0)7887 767755 >>> @philarcher1 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> John S. Erickson, Ph.D. >> Director, Web Science Operations >> Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) >> <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> >> Twitter & Skype: olyerickson >> > -- John S. Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Web Science Operations Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> Twitter & Skype: olyerickson
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 20:20:03 UTC