- From: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:15:33 -0500
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
cygri wrote: > Proposed steps for aligning the two specs: > > - recommend dc:title/description on qb:DataSet in addition to rdfs:label/comment +1...Names are important; dc:title and dc:description will likely lead to stronger, less ambiguous values for these fields. > - recommend dc:issued instead of dc:date for creation date in Data Cube +1...dc:issued implies "first appeared" and is better than "created," "published," etc....Also, dc:date could refer ambiguously to other dates in the lifecycle. > - Add a note to beginning of Data Cube Section 9 that says that other documents such as DCAT have additional recommendations for metadata properties. +1...Good to specify connections between the recommendations like this. > - make dcat:theme a subproperty of dc:subject in DCAT +1...dc:subject is more intuitive and should be primary. dcat:theme seems more dependent on interpretation... > The result would be that if you follow the DCAT recommendations, you end up with something that matches the Cube recommendations, except for the use of a subproperty in the case of dcat:theme vs dc:subject. Yes. Thanks, Richard! -- John S. Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Web Science Operations Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> Twitter & Skype: olyerickson
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 13:16:05 UTC