- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 20:03:44 +0000
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
On 2 Mar 2013, at 22:32, Dave Reynolds wrote: > Something like the slice of latest values does seem me to like a regular and well defined structure, it's just a more subtle one than fixing a bunch of dimensions and not definable by a slice key. That is true, but the proposal here was for introducing a general mechanism for grouping observations, with the latest-value-slice just being one example. Subclasses of qb:ObservationGroup with more precise semantics could be defined in extensions. >> Proposal: Define qb:ObservationGroup, make qb:Slice a subclass of that, define domain of qb:observation to be ObservationGroup. (“Collection” is too generic a term. “ObservationCollection” would work but is a bit long.) > > OK, I can accept that. It's not my preference but it's better than nothing. Will make those changes in my current round of edits. > > I propose to add a property qb:observationGroup (range qb:ObservationGroup, domain open) to allow this new qb:ObservationGroup to be attached wherever it may usefully be attached. Ok. This would be a superproperty of qb:slice, I presume. Best, Richard
Received on Sunday, 3 March 2013 20:04:08 UTC