- From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 20:45:15 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 18:45:44 UTC
Dear Antoine, Sorry if I missed your point in my previous mail... > @Ghislain: I'm not sure I understand your point: "as far as it is reflected in the metadata, such as dct:modified" seems to hint that you're just updating an existing instance of dcat:Dataset. But my point is about when there is a *new resource* of dcat:Dataset, as explained above. > http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Class:_Dataset does not say anything about whether such treatment is allowed or discouraged in DCAT. And thus if ADMS is compliant with DCAT or not. Now that I read the entire thread with Makx, I understand better your point. And I agree there is nothing at the moment in DCAT to handle that issue properly. I wonder if this issue of versioning affects only DCAT. Maybe one solution could be to help the user by clarifying it somewhere in the spec; or maybe handling it like in the ORG vocabulary [1] by creation a dcat:DataSetEvent by linking to PROV-O vocabulary (e.g: with prov:wasDerivedFrom property). Cheers, Ghislain [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#org:ChangeEvent [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#wasDerivedFrom
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 18:45:44 UTC