RE: dcat diff, please review

Maybe the group wants to consider my earlier message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Jul/0040.html
which contains a proposal for resolution of an editorial issue. Although
it concerned a remark on ADMS, the same comment could be made for DCAT.

 

No show stopper.

Makx.

 

 

 

From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:43 PM
To: Public GLD WG
Subject: dcat diff, please review

 

When we agreed [1] to publish dcat's second last call, we included 24
hours review of a diff by the WG.  It took a while to get things ready,
but here's that diff:

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/dcat/diff-20130312-20130801.
html

If you see editorial errors, please report them and we'll fix them for
the following release.  If you see a show stopper, something that means
we really shouldn't release the document, you'll need to speak up by
this time tomorrow.

(Thanks for Phil for stepping in and helping get the document ready.)

      -- Sandro

[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-07-18#resolution_2