AW: ucr shortnames ?

Hello,

>I'm okay with doing that, if Benedikt is okay with your edits and with
>the state of the document.
I read through the document and I am (very) fine with Phil's edits and the state of the document. I am also fine with "vocab-data-cube-use-cases".

See [1] for a static version of the document. Pubrules still shows some errors. Sandro, please have a look and let me know if I can help (in particular, shall I run html-tidy?).

As discussed, see [2] for the dynamic version, which I have set to Editor's Draft.

Thanks for all your help.

Best,

Benedikt

[1] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube-ucr/vocab-data-cube-use-cases-20130720/index.html>
[2] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube-ucr/index.html>


________________________________________
Von: Sandro Hawke [sandro@w3.org]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Juli 2013 21:52
An: Phil Archer
Cc: Public GLD WG
Betreff: ucr shortnames ?

On 07/19/2013 01:25 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
> I have put updated versions of RegOrg and ADMS in place at
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-vocab-adms-20130723/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-vocab-regorg-20130723/
>
> I have also been through Benedikt's message to me from last month and
> taken some action regarding Americanising, sorry, Americanizing, the
> spelling etc. I have recorded my happiness with the doc as it now is.
>
> I have *not*, however, put it through Pub Rules and installed it in TR
> space.
>

I'm okay with doing that, if Benedikt is okay with your edits and with
the state of the document.

We need domain-lead approval for publication, which I could probably get
today but... the short name isn't right.  It's "data-cube-ucr", but
we've taken "r" out of the title.....  Also, data cube is
"vocab-data-cube".     I see dcat-ucr has the same problem.   Maybe
vocab-dcat-ucr and vocab-data-cube-use-cases ?

       -- Sandro

> HTH
>
> Phil.
>
> On 18/07/2013 16:28, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> See https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-07-18
>>
>> It'd be great to get the DCAT and Cube-UCR (and maybe ADMS and RegOrg)
>> publications done on Tuesday -- which means being ready Monday Morning
>> -- so that in the Extension Request (to be considered Wednesday) they
>> can just be "done".
>>
>> But it's not a big deal if they can't   It'd just be nice to get them
>> done, so the group would be down to only four deliverables (dcat, org,
>> cube, bp).
>>
>>         -- Sandro
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 14:36:33 UTC