AW: AW: ORG browser

Hi Dave,

Thanks for your quick reply.

To make the validator even more useful, would it be possible to allow checking of URIs of qb:DataSets, directly?

The validator would resolve the URI and run the integrity checks, directly. Since, possibly, not all required RDF is provided by the qb:DataSet URI, the validator could also resolve the qb:DataStructureDefinition URI, and in turn, the qb:ComponentProperty URIs and qb:CodeList URIs.

Best,

Benedikt

________________________________________
Von: Dave Reynolds [dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Juli 2013 21:37
An: Benedikt Kaempgen
Cc: Government Linked Data Working Group
Betreff: Re: AW: ORG browser

That was the internal address while it was in alpha, the current (which
probably should be treated as beta) release is at the official location
as linked off the implementation reporting page (in turn linked off the
CR document):

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/validator/qb/qb-validator

Dave

On 14/07/13 18:57, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> +1 to a Data Cube checker.
>
> Can you give more details on how to use it? It [2] seems down at the moment but maybe I am just not using it correctly.
>
> Best,
>
> Benedikt
>
> [1] <http://gld01.w3.org/qb-upload>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Dave Reynolds [dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 27. Mai 2013 22:34
> An: Government Linked Data Working Group
> Betreff: Re: ORG browser
>
> I have updated the ORG browser site.
>
> Thanks to Ghislain for pointing out some problems. Those have been fixed
> and, for now at least, I've limited to upload sizes to 5Mb. If that
> proves a problem I will change it (but may need to request more disk space).
>
> I've also implemented a Data Cube checker on the same site [2]. I know I
> was previously unhappy with doing that but I've implemented a linear
> time version of the expensive quadratic check (IC-12). I believe/hope
> that makes it viable. Similar upload limits apply.
>
> With these changes I think the validation site can be regarded as now
> "beta" rather than "alpha", which is good enough to go ahead with CR
> publication.
>
> Dave
>
>
> [2] http://gld01.w3.org/qb-upload
>
> On 23/05/13 14:25, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>> I've deployed an alpha version of the proposed ORG browser [1] for use
>> in gathering implementation conformance information.
>>
>> See [2] for a view of the artificial example data from the validation
>> suite [4] and see [3] for a sample resource within that upload.
>>
>> This will need some reworking to explain the context better in the front
>> page and deal with issues of usage tracking that were raised at the CR
>> meeting.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> [1] http://gld01.w3.org/
>> [2] http://gld01.w3.org/view?upload=upload-2013-05-22T15-39-45-0
>> [3]
>> http://gld01.w3.org/org-view?upload=upload-2013-05-22T15-39-45-0&uri=http%3a%2f%2fexample.com%2fsample1%23unit1
>>
>> [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Validation_Suite
>
>

Received on Monday, 15 July 2013 11:23:15 UTC