- From: Fadi Maali <fadi.maali@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:01:27 +0100
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Cc: public-gld-wg@w3.org
Hi Makx,
Yes it is valid to use xdd:dateTime and any other possible date/time formats defined by XSD.
See the DCAT description at the working draft https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/dcat/index.html#Property:catalog_release_date :
range: rdfs:Literal encoded using the relevant ISO 8601 Date and Time compliant string and typed using the appropriate XML Schema datatype [XMLSCHEMA-2]
Best regards,
Fadi
--------------------------------------------------
Fadi Maali
PhD student @ DERI
Irish Research Council Embark Scholarship holder
http://www.deri.ie/users/fadi-maali
On 11 Jul 2013, at 16:50, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com> wrote:
> My apologies for this late comment. I was made aware in the last couple of days that recording publication and modification events for Dataset with granularity of one day ("date") may not always be adequate. I was given an example of a Dataset that is issued every twelve hours so it would need to be able to record the event with xsd:dateTime rather than xsd:date. I also thought of an example of weather or traffic reports that are published every five minutes.
>
> Is it valid to use dct:issued and dct:modified with xsd:dateTime rather than xsd:date?
>
> Makx.
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Makx Dekkers
> mail@makxdekkers.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 16:01:57 UTC