Re: PLEASE VOTE on publishing BP

+1 on publishing.

Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl
# Enschedepad 76
# 1324 GJ Almere
# The Netherlands
# tel. +31(0)36-5347479
##############################################################

Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote on 18-12-2013 15:27:44:

> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
> To: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
> Date: 18-12-2013 15:28
> Subject: PLEASE VOTE on publishing BP
> 
> Summary: should we go ahead and publish bp as it stands today?   vote 
asap.
> 
> Following the emails of yesterday [1] [2], there's been some 
> disagreement about whether it might still be possible to publish 
> Best Practices.   The chairs have agreed to hold an email vote this 
> week; deadline is the end of the usual meeting time (about 26 hours 
> from when I'm sending this).     If you have a problem with this 
> deadline, please say so, but we don't have a lot of options.   We 
> wont physically be able to publish until January, so if you have a 
> procedural complain in the next two weeks, there will be time to 
consider it.
> 
> There will be an informal meeting, at the usual time tomorrow, 
> during which people can discuss BP if they want, but the email votes
> will be what counts.
> 
> The document under consideration is here (frozen):
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/4dbafa673d70/bp/index.html
> and the diff from Friday's version is here:
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/diff-1213-1218.html
> Please respond via email with a vote (+1 if you support, 0 abstain, 
> -1 formal objection, in between to show nuance if you want) on the 
> proposal below.   If you would vote higher with some small edit, 
> please provide the edit and we'll try to see if there's email 
> consensus for it.   Feel free to make other statements, but please 
> keep it brief.   If anyone votes -1 or if only a few people vote +1,
> the document will be left unpublished (but still in its current 
> location on the web).

> PROPOSED: Publish https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/4dbafa673d70/
> bp/index.html, with minimal edits necessary to make it pubrules 
> compliant and fix simple typos.    We believe that the document in 
> its current form expresses Best Practices for publishing Government 
> Linked Data.   We understand it might be updated by another group in
> the future or might remain as-is.
> Thank you for your prompt response.
> 
>        -- Sandro (in consultation with the chairs & Phil)
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Dec/0069.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Dec/0071.html 
etc