- From: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:16:27 -0500
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, public-gld-wg@w3.org
Hi Phil, On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > In addition to Dave and Makx's comments (which I agree with pretty much throughout), I'd like to add the following. > > Section 5, Metadata. More could be said there, for example, a link to DCAT and, as an example of how to use it, the EC's DCAT Application Profile (https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/asset_release/dcat-application-profile-data-portals-europe-final) written by Makx. At this late stage, we should avoid the urge to add new content. This is a Note that future editors hopefully can take & extend. This month, the BP editors are fixing things that are incorrect, broken or poorly structured. > > 7. Licences > > The problem here is not that it's too American - there's useful info there - but that it's really only American. The line about Crown Copyright might lead to a reference to the UK Open Government Licence (http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/) for example. Many governments are in the process of working out how to licence their data (there are whole EU projects about it such as http://lapsi-project.eu/ but sadly that site is not guaranteed to be persistent so I'm hesitant to suggest linking to it. OK, apparently only an American contributed to this section ;-) I've cut it down & left bread crumbs should someone in the future wish to expand. The link to the useful CC site remains. > > 8. Convert Data to Linked Data > > The sentence "This involves a data modeling step..." should link back to the modelling section. Done. > > The sentence that ends "...mapping the source data into a set of RDF statements via a script" suggests, or might suggest to some, that there is 'a script' - i.e. a single tool for doing this. I would say something like 'programmatically' or 'through an automated process', 'using one of a variety of tools' etc. Done. Adopted DaveR's suggested list of conversion strategies. > > I think sections 10 & 11 should also be merged. URI construction is an important part of designing for persistence. Done. > > That'll do for now - we can talk more on the imminent call. All in email now. Cheers, Bernadette > > HTH > > Phil. > > > On 17/12/2013 08:33, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> Hi Bernadette, >> >> On 17/12/13 04:53, Bernadette Hyland wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Thanks for the review you did do. See inline below. >>> >>> On Dec 15, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Dave Reynolds <Dave.e.Reynolds@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >> >>>> # 4 Data Modelling >>>> >>>> Not sure what value this section adds, it says too little. Should >>>> either say more or say that modelling advice is out of scope. >>> >>> Will beef up with a bit more description to make it clear the modeling >>> step is really important. In the real world we face people who heard >>> there is a 'convert to RDF' tool and they cannot distinguish between >>> auto-magic conversion vs. well-modeled content that uses standard >>> vocabs & is expressed as something others can re-use. >> >> I'm not sure beefing this up is the way to go. >> >> Fully agree that the modelling step is really important. But it's not >> clear to me that we could reach consensus on best practices for >> modelling within the short time left. We already have sections on >> ontology selection and ontology creation which are arguably the major >> part of modelling. [Though our advice on creation doesn't actually tell >> you anything about how to develop one.] >> >> My suggestion would be to say words to the effect of: >> * Modelling is really important. >> * Advice on detailed modelling is out of scope for this document. >> * A key part of modelling is selecting or developing appropriate >> ontologies, some advice on this is contained in the following sections ... >> >> Cheers, >> Dave >> >> > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 >
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 23:16:57 UTC