- From: Joćo Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:02:47 -0300
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Dear Phil, We can do that. That is, we'll make a proposal and bring it to the group. I hope we'll be able to address the concern Dave raised with respect to the diagram we produced earlier for ORG, and I believe we can build consensus on some form of graphical representation. I am sorry I was not able to join in the discussion today on ORG/RegOrg. This is because Brazil is -5 hours with respect to Dublin time. Regards, Joćo Paulo On 12/4/13 7:06 AM, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org> wrote: >During the face to face meeting (still ongoing), we've been discussing a >comment concerning the diagram for the ORG ontology. This highlights the >fact that all those of us who have created diagrams for our vocabs use >different tools and create different-looking diagrams. > >Ideally, we'd like them all to have the same look and feel. And even >more ideally we'd like the diagrams to be clickable so you can jump to >the relevant definitions etc. That's a nice to have, not a requirement. > >Do you have the tooling and/or the time to help create these please? > >Phil. > > >-- > > >Phil Archer >W3C eGovernment >http://www.w3.org/egov/ > >http://philarcher.org >+44 (0)7887 767755 >@philarcher1 >
Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 12:03:28 UTC