- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:20:45 +0100
- To: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
As those on the call today will know, I've spent today on ADMS and i need to record what I've done as several changes are not trivial. The new version is available at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html High level ========= ADMS has been brought much more into line with the thinking and actions taken over our other vocabularies. I have posited ADMS as a profile of DCAT, defined adms:SemanticAsset as a sub class of dcat:Dataset etc. and re-used as much of DCAT as possible. Declaring ADMS to be a profile of DCAT is something that today's meeting agreed to check with Fadi and the WG at large. It feels right but needs those closer to DCAT to confirm. Makx took an action item to follow up on this. If needs be, I can remove text that says ADMS is a profile of DCAT and remove the sub class relationships. All mention of RADion has been removed. The only mention of XML is that an XML schema is available along with the original European Commission publication. ADMS is defined purely as an RDF vocab. Overall, the document is very much simpler than the much more comprehensive original document that Makx created last year - because it has a lot less to do. Specifics ========= adms:accessURL has been removed, replaced by dcat:accessURL and dcat:downloadURL dcat:landingPage replaces foaf:homepage. Text for dcat:accessURL, dcat:downloadURL and dcat:landingPage has been copied verbatim from DCAT. dcterms:alternative has been replaced by skos:altLabel. dcterms:title replaces rdfs:label dcat:mediaType added and dcterms:format has been retained as in DCAT. (adms:representationTechnique is unchanged as well). dcat:keyword replaces radion:keyword dcterms:issued replaces dcterms:created. I have used my preferred wording for date strings (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0008.html) I am about to actively seek feedback from the existing user-base of ADMS and hope to bring that to the F2F meeting next week. Other comments are, of course, welcome. I'm hoping to seek approval to publish this as a WG Note during the meeting. Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2013 17:21:42 UTC