- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:23:04 +0000
- To: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Thanks to everyone on today's call, especially Dave for scribing. I'm sorry you had to put up with so much of me talking. Towards the end I heard Bernadette and others expressing entirely justified worries about mission creep and putting a cap on taking on more than we should. Against that, I believe that some sort of association between DCAT and ADMS is desirable, not to mention any other vocabularies that might come along to describe repositories (like the one I'm working on concerning software forges). Therefore, my proposal is that I publish RADion as little more than a namespace document at a suitable location on w3.org. The GLD WG can then decide whether or not to make relevant sub class relationships between RADion and DCAT in the way that ADMS will. I hope that DCAT will too but there will be no dependency created by this action. Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 16:23:36 UTC