- From: Christophe Guéret <c.d.m.gueret@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 22:22:36 +0100
- To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- CC: "public-gld-wg@w3.org" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 21:23:07 UTC
On 7 March 2012 10:01, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>wrote: > > >>>> For "org" and "people", I'm inclined to go with vocab-org and > >>>> vocab-people. I think http://www.w3.org/TR/people suggests a somewhat > >>>> larger scope than this document has. > >>> > >>> > >>> +1 for vocab-people etc. - looks sensible and scalable to me. > >> > >> +1 > > > > +1 too > +1 also for vocab-people +1 > > The mobile WG I was in produced a couple of Best Practice docs that have > > short names of mobile-bp and mwabp. The former works because it includes > > the word mobile but the same isn't true for mwabp which I always > > struggle to remember. > > > > Personally I'd leave out the government bit but the group consensus > > seems to be to keep it, so I end up with suggesting > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/gld-bp > > +1 > +1 Cheers, Christophe
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 21:23:07 UTC