Re: suggested shortnames

Thanks Sandro for kicking off the thread and for rapid comments from everyone else.  'Many hands make light work.'

On Mar 7, 2012, at 4:01 AM, Ghislain Atemezing wrote:

> 
>>>>> For "org" and "people", I'm inclined to go with vocab-org and
>>>>> vocab-people. I think http://www.w3.org/TR/people suggests a somewhat
>>>>> larger scope than this document has.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> +1 for vocab-people etc. - looks sensible and scalable to me.
>>> 
>>> +1
>> 
>> +1 too
> 
> +1 also for vocab-people

+1 vocab-people

And while we're on a naming theme, how is everyone with:

vocab-org for the Organization Ontology?

vocab-data-cube for the Data Cube Vocabulary?

>>> 
> 
>> The mobile WG I was in produced a couple of Best Practice docs that have
>> short names of mobile-bp and mwabp. The former works because it includes
>> the word mobile but the same isn't true for mwabp which I always
>> struggle to remember.
>> 
>> Personally I'd leave out the government bit but the group consensus
>> seems to be to keep it, so I end up with suggesting
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/gld-bp
> 
> +1

+1 gld-bp

Thereby retaining the GLD prefix but keeping it short.  I don't think adding 'pub' and 'ld' at the short name stage adds value/differentiation.  We can say all that stuff in the first sentence or two.

Thanks everyone.  Speak with you Thursday and hopefully we can finalized the permanent URL for documents and its future version at w3.org.

Cheers,

Bernadette Hyland, co-chair 
W3C Government Linked Data Working Group
Charter: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/

Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 11:56:41 UTC