- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:21:36 +0000
- To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
- CC: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 06/03/12 15:48, Bernadette Hyland wrote: > Hi Dave, > This was discussed in a previous GLD WG call & I'm planning to send the > email to W3C staff to request official move to FPWD today (which I think > is required procedurally.) Was there a call last week after all then? The week before (Feb 23) we voted to publish ORG and agreed we would vote on Data Cube, after these edits, but didn't actually vote. [1] > In any event, the process is moving forward > in March. Thanks for your patience. > > Thank you very much for your work and keeping us on track. Much appreciated. n.p. I mention it because I believe W3C staff will want a pointer to the working group resolution, which I didn't think we had, yet. Dave [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-02-23 > > Cheers, > > Bernadette Hyland, co-chair > W3C Government Linked Data Working Group > /Charter: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld// > > On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > >> Since I'm "at risk" for this weeks meeting I just wanted to confirm >> that the Data Cube working draft [1] has been updated to reflect the >> editorial suggestions made by Curran Kelleher [2]. >> >> As noted in [3] I'm assuming that since the Data Cube document has >> been open to public review for some time, and given Curran's review >> comments, that a further formal working group review is not needed. In >> which case I believe this is ready for voting on FPWD. Richard, do you >> agree? >> >> Dave >> >> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2012Feb/0000.html >> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Mar/0001.html >> >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 16:22:10 UTC