Re: gld - best practices ed - motivation section

Hi Bernadette

On 18/01/2012 16:42, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
> Thanks Boris.  I like the enhancements to the diagram.
>
> I've added the GLD WG to this discussion since it goes a bit broader 
> than the diagram alone.
Ok, thanks
>
> All the things you listed are projects in varying forms of 'production 
> readiness'.  Let's add an agenda item at the F2F re: what level of 
> maturity (for lack of a better word) should a project/site be before 
> we include as advice in a W3C Recommendation.
I've included this item under the *Vocabulary Selection discussion.*
> Can you explain schema-cache in context of LOD?  Are you referring to 
> the Talis schema cache of vocabularies (http://schemacache.com/)?
Yes, I'm referring to the Talis schema cache of vocabs.
It includes a set of vocabularies we can reuse.
>
> Any thoughts on this to start the discussion before we head to the F2F.
>
> Quick changes:
>
> * Would you be able to hyperlink the images to the actual sites, e.g., 
> Swoogle, Watson, LOV.  Please add Sindice.
I've included Sindice.
Yes, I think there won't be problem to include the links (I'll do it  
later).

Thanks again

Boris
>
> Cheers,
> Bernadette
>
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>
>> Hi Bernadette
>>
>> I updated the 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Best_Practices_Discussion_Summary#2.2.2_Best_Practices_for_Vocabulary_Selection 
>> wiki section
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Boris
>>
>>
>> On 04/10/2011 19:16, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
>>> Thanks Boris for putting together the new & improved diagram.  That 
>>> is great.
>>>
>>> Yes, the work I did on the cookbook will be contributed to the LD 
>>> Cookbook.  That said, there is no pride in authorship and I'm sure 
>>> with another year of experience under my belt, I'll have lots of 
>>> revisions to make myself.  Others will no doubt have more 
>>> suggestions & improvements.
>>>
>>> Your hybrid diagram is absolutely fine, makes sense & is a good 
>>> iteration. Thanks.  I want to do more with diagrams and make this 
>>> stuff look familiar & less scary to new Linked Data converts.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Bernadette Hyland
>>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi Bernadette, Michael
>>>>
>>>> I've included a new slide, please find attached the updated pdf.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Boris
>>>>
>>>> On 30/09/2011 2:50, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>>>>> Hi Bernadette, Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> I was checking the best practices editors draft [1], and I have 
>>>>> one comment/suggestion regarding Motivation section.
>>>>> Michael included a question saying if would it make sense to base 
>>>>> the mentioned GLD life cycle on the generalLinked Data life cycles 
>>>>> [2]?
>>>>>
>>>>> I totally agree with Michael, but I think it would be good to 
>>>>> integrate the Linked Data life cycles [1] with the life cycle we 
>>>>> propose in our Linking Government Data chapter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find attached a pdf that includes some thoughts about this, 
>>>>> and a very first proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Boris
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/bcb72f87b5cc/bp/index.html
>>>>> [2] http://linked-data-life-cycles.info/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/09/2011 20:08, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>>> Congratulations on getting this to last call.  I guess I know what you've been working on lately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FWIW, I was asked by the chair of the W3 egov IG to join their second telecon to review the GLD WG charter&  our deliverables.  I looked at the schedule and realized we have some deliverables and both of us have been busy with things other than the Best Practices editor's draft deliverable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So this is a gentle nudge to the three of us, and really to me as much as anyone, that we may want to look at the schedule in the lead up to the Jan 2012 F2F.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I plan to make a major update to the cookbook wiki with content I've already prepared.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bernadette Hyland
>>>>>> 3 Round Stones, Inc.
>>>>>> Linked Data Specialists
>>>>>> Direct.  +1-571-331-3758
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 20, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chairs, All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the Last Call Working Draft transition announcement for the following Recommendation Track specifications:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Document Title: 'A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF'
>>>>>>> URI:http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110920/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Document Title: 'R2RML: RDB to RDF Mapping Language'
>>>>>>> URI:http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-r2rml-20110920/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Instructions for providing feedback
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you wish to make comments regarding this specification please send them to<public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org>  which is an email list publicly archived athttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-comments/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. Review end date
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This Last Call period ends on 1 November 2011.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RDB2RDF Working Group made the decision [1] for the LC transition at its teleconference on 13 Sep 2011.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2011/09/13-RDB2RDF-minutes.html#lc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. Evidence that the document satisfies group's requirements
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RDB2RDF Working Group believes that these specifications satisfy the requirements of the charter [2] as well as  the 'Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF' [3].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/rdb2rdf-charter
>>>>>>> [3]http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-ucr/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. The names of groups with dependencies
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following groups are suspected to have an interest in reviewing the specifications:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * SPARQL Working Group
>>>>>>> * RDF Working Group
>>>>>>> * Provenance Working Group
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5. Report of any Formal Objections
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Working Group received no Formal Objection during the preparation of this specification.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 6. Patent Disclosure Page
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A link can be found athttp://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/43889/status
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> 	Michael and Ashok, RDB2RDF co-chairs, on behalf of the RDB2RDF WG
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <motivation_bp.pdf>
>>>
>>
>