W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > February 2012

RE: ISSUE-34 (Subslices): Clarify or drop qb:subslice ? [Data Cube Vocabulary]

From: Benedikt Kämpgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:45:48 +0100
To: <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <013d01ccf019$01f7fde0$05e7f9a0$@fzi.de>
Hello,

There is no example given in the spec of the possible benefit of using qb:subSlice and how that may affect attachment levels, maybe an example would help with this issue.

Regards,

Benedikt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Government Linked Data Working Group Issue Tracker
> [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 5:49 PM
> To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-34 (Subslices): Clarify or drop qb:subslice ? [Data Cube
> Vocabulary]
> 
> ISSUE-34 (Subslices): Clarify or drop qb:subslice ? [Data Cube Vocabulary]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/34
> 
> Raised by: Dave Reynolds
> On product: Data Cube Vocabulary
> 
> The Data Cube slice mechanism allows hierarchical organization of slices
> though the use of qb:subSlice.
> 
> However, it is not possible to distinguish between different levels of sub-
> slice when defining attachment levels, which in terms makes abbreviated
> formats for such cubes under-defined.
> 
> Possibilities include:
> 
> (1) Deprecate qb:subSlice (der has not seen it use in practice, despite
> originally arguing for its inclusion in the spec).
> 
> (2) Retain it and add machinery or constraints on its use with abbreviated
> formats.
> 
> This relates to ISSUE-33
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 21:46:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:35 UTC