- From: Ronald P. Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:30:44 -0500
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
When it is logical through the addition of the word "unbounded" to "tighten up the definition", it sounds like the correct answer to me. +1 On 02/09/2012 02:26 PM, Gillman, Daniel - BLS wrote: > How about this? > Persistent data - data for which machine access is unbounded > > Dan > > > Dan Gillman > Bureau of Labor Statistics > Office of Survey Methods Research > 2 Massachusetts Ave, NE > Washington, DC 20212 USA > Tel +1.202.691.7523 > FAX +1.202.691.7426 > Email Gillman.Daniel@BLS.Gov > ----------------------------------------- > "Whatever it is, I'm against it! > No matter what it is or who commenced it, > I'm against it!" > ~ Groucho Marx > ------------------------------------------ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronald P. Reck [mailto:rreck@rrecktek.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 2:16 PM > To: public-gld-wg@w3.org > Subject: a "long period" for Stability > > As Anne W. pointed out to me in private communications, a common definition of persistent sounds like this: > > > Persistent = Information is machine accessible for long periods of time. > > > The problem I have with this is that "long periods" is a very ambiguous > concept on the web. I know we touched on this at the F2F but I wish I > knew how to tighten it up a bit. > > - long periods to data at my house is through 2 hard drive standards > (MFM/IDE/EIDE/SATA..) > - Long periods in the scope of the Internet is a couple decades...? > - Long periods to a person might mean a generation... > - Long periods of weather data could mean since the last ice age? > > Any formative comments about how I can rephrase "long periods" to scope > it better would be appreciated. > > -Ronald P. Reck >
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 19:30:32 UTC