- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:35:18 +0000
- To: Government Linked Data Working Group WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
See my comments for Issue-18. I think this is way out of scope for a vocab describing a person but obviously in scope for a vocabulary describing a project. On 28/01/2012 10:43, Government Linked Data Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-20: How to relate a person to a project [People] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/20 > > Raised by: Michael Hausenblas > On product: People > > What vocabulary shall we use for projects? It doesn't look too promising in terms of (generic) candidates [1] - maybe FOAF again? > > [1] http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/10002/vocabulary-to-describe-projects > > > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 17:35:57 UTC