See my comments for Issue-18. I think this is way out of scope for a vocab describing a person but obviously in scope for a vocabulary describing a project. On 28/01/2012 10:43, Government Linked Data Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-20: How to relate a person to a project [People] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/20 > > Raised by: Michael Hausenblas > On product: People > > What vocabulary shall we use for projects? It doesn't look too promising in terms of (generic) candidates [1] - maybe FOAF again? > > [1] http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/10002/vocabulary-to-describe-projects > > > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 17:35:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:51:59 UTC