W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: ISSUE-20: How to relate a person to a project [People]

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:35:18 +0000
Message-ID: <4F2C1AD6.4010103@w3.org>
To: Government Linked Data Working Group WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
See my comments for Issue-18. I think this is way out of scope for a 
vocab describing a person but obviously in scope for a vocabulary 
describing a project.


On 28/01/2012 10:43, Government Linked Data Working Group Issue Tracker 
wrote:
>
> ISSUE-20: How to relate a person to a project [People]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/20
>
> Raised by: Michael Hausenblas
> On product: People
>
> What vocabulary shall we use for projects? It doesn't look too promising in terms of (generic) candidates [1] - maybe FOAF again?
>
> [1] http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/10002/vocabulary-to-describe-projects
>
>
>
>


-- 


Phil Archer
W3C eGovernment
http://www.w3.org/egov/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 17:35:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:35 UTC