- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:56:43 +0000
- To: Government Linked Data Working Group WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
The other biggie in this space isn't an RDF vocab but the UN/CEFACT Core Component Library [1]. You get a 14MB Excel file with a lot of terms in it. Things like the French Person model [2] use it as the base. Then there are things like the UK Gov list at [3]. Looking at these for the ISA Core Person shows a reasonably consistent model. It gets a bit less consistent if you start to consider things like marital status, parents' names etc. In the ISA work we've got a couple of odd-balls that may or may not survive public consultation: Patronymic Name (Helga Magnusdottir and Olav Magnusson are siblings) Places are described using a 'Location' class that allows you to define a location, whether a country or a specific place, by any combination of Geographic Name, geographic identifier, geolocation geometry or address. Oh and did someone bring up the issue of how to represent fuzzy dates? ;-) [1] http://www.unece.org/cefact/codesfortrade/unccl/CCL_index.html [2] https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/fr_person/release/050 [3] http://interim.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/govtalk/schemasstandards/e-gif/datastandards/person_information.aspx On 28/01/2012 10:10, Government Linked Data Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-17: Who are the contenders and how do they play together? [People] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/17 > > Raised by: Michael Hausenblas > On product: People > > As of our charter, sec. 2.3, we're supposed to defines terms to describe: > > [[ > > People, such as elements of FOAF or vCard in RDF. This is an area for particular attention to privacy considerations. > ]] > > Obviously, the charter mentions vCard and FOAF but there are also other vocabularies that can and maybe should be used to describe people such as Schema.org, ISA Core Person Vocabulary, etc.) > > > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 16:57:11 UTC