- From: Maali, Fadi <fadi.maali@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:45:11 +0100
- To: "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi, DCAT looks good to me. Thanks! - Fadi -----Original Message----- From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] Sent: Thu 4/5/2012 8:05 AM To: Sandro Hawke Cc: public-gld-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: changes to docs, for publication, please double check Unless Fadi or John say otherwise, I'd say DCAT is good to go too. Phil. On 05/04/2012 07:01, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Editors, please look over all the changes I made to your documents in > order to (1) make our respec use consistent across the documents, and > (2) fix broken links and broken markup, (3) makes sure there's a proper > SOTD. Hopefully I didn't actually break anything. > > You can also check the publication-location versions, to make sure those > are also okay. They are NOT CONSIDERED PUBLISHED until they actually > appear on http://www.w3.org/TR and the shortnames become live -- before > that, these URLs should not be shown in public; after that, the > documents should not be changed. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-dcat-20120405/ > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-org-20120405/ > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-people-20120405/ > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-data-cube-20120405/ > > -- Sandro > > > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 10:46:21 UTC