Re: comment on the Data Cube vocabulary document

Hello Dave,

Yes, I am happy with the resolution.

Regards,
Frans

On 9-5-2013 18:51, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> Hi Frans,
>
> Apologies, my original reply [1] to this seems to have gone to just 
> the comments list and not directly you.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. We have fixed this in the editor's draft 
> by adding the missing example prefix definition in section 3 [2].
>
> Please could you confirm that you are happy with this resolution.
>
> Best wishes,
> Dave
>
> [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0005.html
>
> [2] 
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#namespaces
>
> On 03/04/13 15:33, Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I saw the request for comments on the new vocabularies. I have a minor
>> comment on the Data Cube document
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-vocab-data-cube-20130312/>: In example 1
>> the prefix 'interval' is used, but the namespace is not listed in
>> chapter 3 (Namespaces and Document Conventions), nor is it specified
>> elsewhere.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Frans Knibbe
>> Geodan <http://geodan.com/>
>


-- 
--------------------------------------
*Geodan*
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer 
<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
--------------------------------------