- From: Marios Meimaris <m.meimaris@medialab.ntua.gr>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:13:36 +0300
- To: kotis@aegean.gr
- CC: public-gld-comments@w3.org, kotis@samos.gr, h.athanasakis@samos.gr, nikolaos.loutas@pwc.be, stijn.goedertier@pwc.be
- Message-ID: <51700DA0.1040305@medialab.ntua.gr>
Kostas, Nikos, IHU uses RegOrg, however NTUA's classification is a profile of ORG. This is done because our primary intention was to describe payers and payees that are not limited to formally registered organizations. As is stated in the ORG [1] document > It is anticipated that profiles will either introduce sub-classes > oforg:Organization > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/org/index.html#org:Organization>or > define a classification scheme for organizations. To support the > latter the ontology supplies a propertyorg:classification > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/org/index.html#org:classification>which > can be used the classify an organization using a SKOS [SKOS-REFERENCE > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/org/index.html#bib-SKOS-REFERENCE>] > concept scheme. We have taken the former approach, making the custom taxonomy's top concept a subclass of org:Organization . This way, traversing the graph up starting from here http://publicspending.medialab.ntua.gr/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpublicspending.medialab.ntua.gr%2ForganizationsOntology%23PublicLegalEntity you can see that you end up in an ORG class. The psgr:legalStatus property is a mere transfer of the string literal found in the General Secretariat of Information Systems (GSIS) web service to the psgr dataset. Nikos, I know they are not plain literals, but (pardon my ignorance if I'm wrong) they are drawn from the psgr:legalStatus property which comes from the legal status description found in the GSIS web service. The overlapping information and meaning I mentioned earlier is found in GSIS, not in IHU. Sorry for any misunderstanding. Kind regards, Marios Meimaris On 18/04/2013 17:20, Kotis Kostas wrote: > Thanks for that. Actually, I do know that your work is 'feeding' IHU!!! > > I still have a problem though. I'd like to describe it with an example > however: I am searching for the rdf data related to my organization, i.e. > North Aegean Region Administrative Authority (NARAA) "ÐÅÑÉÖÅÑÅÉÁ ÂÏÑÅÉÏÕ > ÁÉÃÁÉÏÕ' in Greek, and I get the following 2 responses for both sparql > services respectively: > > 1. http://publicspending.medialab.ntua.gr/describe/paymentAgents/090344143 > (NTUA) > 2. http://linkeddata.ihu.edu.gr/id/company/090344143 (IHU) > > As expected, there is a sameAs property relating these entities (defined in > IHU dataset). But in (1), the entity is described as "ÄÇÌÏÓÉÁ ÕÐÇÑÅÓÉÁ" via > the property psgr:legalStatus, and in (2) the entity is described as " > ÄÇÌÏÓÉÁ ÕÐÇÑÅÓÉÁ@gr" using the property > http://www.w3.org/ns/regorg#companyType. In addition, you now introduce a > new term to characterize organizations in Greece, using the uri > http://publicspending.medialab.ntua.gr/organizationsOntology#PublicLegalEnti > ty (label "Public Legal Entity", which I guess it comes from your own custom > vocabulary (which you say it is a profile of ORG). > > The question is, give all these three different ways to describe the type of > my organization, i.e. a 'Greek public formal legal organization', which > namespace will be the most appropriate? I feel that re-using REGORG > namespace is a more appropriate practice, don't you? > > Anyways, for me now it is a matter of linking our dataset with one of the > two datasets (IHU or NTUA), since NARAA entity is already defined in the > LOGD (twice). > > BR, > > Kostas > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marios Meimaris [mailto:m.meimaris@medialab.ntua.gr] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 4:26 PM > To: public-gld-comments@w3.org; Kotis Kostas > Subject: Re: ÁÐ: RegOrg ontology > > Dear Kostas, > > the data from the IHU browser is actually drawn from the sparql > endpoint at http://publicspending.medialab.ntua.gr/ . > The IHU project uses the string descriptions taken from the greek taxation > service (TAXIS), but there is no actual standardization or schema involved > and sometimes the strings have overlapping meanings and even typos. > In the publicspending.gr project we have actually deployed a small taxonomy > for greek organizations as a profile of ORG, having in mind future mappings > to foreign classification schemata. > You can see the legal entity types here > http://publicspending.medialab.ntua.gr/en/endpoint , selecting the > predefined query "Categorization of legal entities" from the example queries > dropdown. > > > Kind regards, > Marios Meimaris > > > On 18/04/2013 16:16, Kotis Kostas wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> just found an interesting project in Greece, as an ISA pilot use case by > IHU, where they actually defined a SKOS concept scheme for Greek Company > types. There they have also included "Public Service" (ÄÇÌÏÓÉÁ ÕÐÇÑÅÓÉÁ@gr) > under http://www.w3.org/ns/regorg#companyType (for greek public > organizations). >> I hope you can access the related resource url: >> http://linkeddata.ihu.edu.gr/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flinkeddata.ihu >> .edu.gr%2Fid%2Fgrtypes%2Fdy otherwise see at >> http://linkeddata.ihu.edu.gr:8080/rdf-browser/ >> >> BR, >> >> Konstantinos >> >> Konstantinos Kotis, PhD >> Post Doctoral Research Scientist >> Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus. >> Head of IT Department >> Samos Regional Unit, North Aegean Region Admin. Authority. >> >> Greece >> +30 6974822712 >> http://gr.linkedin.com/in/kotis >> ________________________________________ >> Áðü: Chris Beer [chris@codex.net.au] >> ÁðïóôïëÞ: ÔåôÜñôç, 17 Áðñéëßïõ 2013 11:32 ðì >> Ðñïò: Kotis Kostas >> Êïéí.: phila@w3.org; public-gld-comments@w3.org >> ÈÝìá: Re: RegOrg ontology >> >> Hi Kotis >> >> Saw this -> randomly jumping in. >> >> My first instinct (noting the similarities in our organisations in terms > of names ;) ) would be to see your example as an ORG unit/entity which has > the function of Regional Administration. >> If the RAB's in Greece conduct a commercial activity (as opposed to say > simply setting policy priorities and administrating grant funding as a > public sector function) then certainly here they would fit the description > of a rov:companyType ( we call them a Government Business Enterprise or GBE > - and we would link back to ORG to a Department of State and associated > Cabinet Minister through a PROV change event such as our Financial > Management Act which governs how the public sector can engage with the > public commercially). >> I guess what I am suggesting is to look to already defined PROV and ORG > entities etc, to see if a logical combination presents itself which would > alleviate the creation of a bespoke concept? >> 2 cents worth - feel free to disregard or vehemently argue all. :) >> >> Cheers >> >> Chris >> >> ----------------------- >> >> Chris Beer >> Manager - Online Services >> Department of Regional Australia, Local Government, Arts and Sport >> >> All views my own unless otherwise stated >> >> >> Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad >> >> Kotis Kostas <kotis@aegean.gr> wrote: >> >>> Dear Phil, >>> >>> I am working on an ontology for 'IT helpdesk support ticketing' for > public sector organizations (eGov) and I am using ORG and RegOrg > vocabularies for some upper level descriptions of example data. I think that > rov:companyType property is not suitable for public organizations, or is it? > Introducing for instance a concept "Regional Administration Body' in order > to classify an instance such as the public organization 'North Aegean > Regional Administration' body of Greece, could be possbile? >>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>> Konstantinos Kotis, PhD >>> Post Doctoral Research Scientist >>> Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus. >>> Head of IT Department >>> Samos Regional Unit, North Aegean Region Admin. Authority. >>> >>> Greece >>> +30 6974822712 >>> http://gr.linkedin.com/in/kotis >
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 15:14:25 UTC