- From: Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:11:51 +0000
- To: "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
Hi, Based on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2015Aug/0000.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2015Aug/0001.html, here are new responses. Thanks to Michael/Fantasi for the feedback. I've attached the previous survey response for everyone's reference. ----- -Paste in URLs to a representative sample (1-3 links) of your specs. If styling differs substantially between /TR and your editor's drafts, please link to both versions. http://www.w3.org/TR/geolocation-API/ http://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-event/ http://www.w3.org/TR/geofencing/ -What spec pre-processor(s) does your WG use? Primarily ReSpec -Paste in URLs to any WG-specific style sheets you use. None at this time. -What do you like about your current styles? It's pretty readable and establishes a fairly clear visual hierarchy. Basically it's fine. -What do you dislike about your current styles? It often does not work well on mobile devices. -> position:fixed banners for e.g. "Editor's Draft" take up too much precious screen space, all the time -> Too much whitespace around the edges of the document, shortens visible line length -> Too-large indentation of lists squishes content to the right side of the screen -> The W3C logo does not look sharp on high-res screens -> WebIDL and code samples do not wrap smartly and cause horizontal scrolling -> Indentation of WebIDL blocks makes this worse, maybe it does not need indentation as it has other visual markers as well -> Longer headings tend to wrap to multiple lines -Paste in URLs to any parts of your spec that are stylistically complex or tricky, and we should therefore be careful not to screw up. http://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-event/#deviceorientation http://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-event/#worked-example -The new styles will include rules for rendering data tables. These will be opt-in by class name, and rely heavily on good markup (use of THEAD, TBODY, COLGROUP, scope attributes, etc.). {NOTE: Examples are providing in hyperlinks found on https://www.w3.org/wiki/SpecProd/Restyle/Survey). Paste in URLs to a sampling of any data tables you are using so that we can try to accommodate those in the styling, if practical. None at this time. -The CSSWG has made a number of minor improvements to the existing spec styles, which we might just adopt wholesale. Please comment on what you like/dislike about these styles, as demonstrated in the CSS3 Text specification. No comments at this time -Is there anything else we should consider? No. -----Original Message----- From: Mandyam, Giridhar [mailto:mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 3:08 PM To: public-geolocation@w3.org Cc: fantasai Subject: /TR Style Sheet Update 2016 - Survey Hello W3C Geolocation WG, We are overdue (my fault) in responding to the style sheet survey from the CSS Working Group. The survey may be found at https://www.w3.org/wiki/SpecProd/Restyle/Survey. I am providing candidate answers to the questions here, but group members have a chance to respond/modify/comment on the survey and answers. If nothing is received by August 12, 2015, then the following responses can be considered final on behalf of the Geolocation WG. Thanks, -Giri Mandyam, Geolocation Working Group Chair ------- -Paste in URLs to a representative sample (1-3 links) of your specs. If styling differs substantially between /TR and your editor's drafts, please link to both versions. http://www.w3.org/TR/geolocation-API/ http://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-event/ http://www.w3.org/TR/geofencing/ -What spec pre-processor(s) does your WG use? Primarily ReSpec -Paste in URLs to any WG-specific style sheets you use. None at this time. -What do you like about your current styles? ReSpec is well-documented, and fairly easy to modify as necessary if one is familiar with the tool. -What do you dislike about your current styles? Newcomers to ReSpec encounter a variable learning curve, depending on how comfortable they are with markdown. -Paste in URLs to any parts of your spec that are stylistically complex or tricky, and we should therefore be careful not to screw up. http://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-event/#deviceorientation http://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-event/#worked-example -The new styles will include rules for rendering data tables. These will be opt-in by class name, and rely heavily on good markup (use of THEAD, TBODY, COLGROUP, scope attributes, etc.). {NOTE: Examples are providing in hyperlinks found on https://www.w3.org/wiki/SpecProd/Restyle/Survey). Paste in URLs to a sampling of any data tables you are using so that we can try to accommodate those in the styling, if practical. None at this time. -The CSSWG has made a number of minor improvements to the existing spec styles, which we might just adopt wholesale. Please comment on what you like/dislike about these styles, as demonstrated in the CSS3 Text specification. No comments at this time -Is there anything else we should consider? No.
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:12:21 UTC