- From: Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@quicinc.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:33:30 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>
- CC: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "ashimura@w3.org" <ashimura@w3.org>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
There already is a repo: https://github.com/w3c/geolocation-api. The purpose of the original request which I sent out in June was to get explicit feedback as to whether the group feels there are any issues with republishing the V1 spec with the identified bug fixes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2014Jun/0004.html. -Giri -----Original Message----- From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 1:56 PM To: Michael van Ouwerkerk; Mandyam, Giridhar Cc: public-geolocation; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; ashimura@w3.org; Mounir Lamouri Subject: RE: Geolocation Errata and Updated Working Draft On October 14, 2014 at 4:52:37 PM, Mandyam, Giridhar (mandyam@quicinc.com) wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > I’ll let Dom or Kaz comment on behalf of the W3C, but I believe the > Errata was meant to address discrepancies between V1 of the > specification and WebIDL > (http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/geoapi-errata.html) > – the two specs did not evolve at the same pace. I don’t think we have > carte blanche to make wholesale changes to the V1 version of the API, > although there are certainly valid concerns with it. Errata should be folded into a new spec and republished, along with other issues that have been identified during implementation. The TR should then point to a Living Document for a Second Edition on GH - the new publication process for the W3C is being announced at TPAC so we should be able to take advantage of it in the next few months. That will hopefully stop the stagnation of these documents - and having them GitHub will help with their maintenance.
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 13:34:02 UTC