RE: Proposal to add unit quaternion representation to the Device Orientation event.

Hi Mounir,
It just went to Last Call:  http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-geometry-1-20140626/.  I wonder if we bring this in at this point.

One possibility is to suggest this as a change to the Geometry I/F Module Level 1 spec prior to the August 7 deadline for LC comments, and go ahead and list the quaternion interface in DeviceOrientation until it is adopted in the Geometry I/F.

Does anyone else have opinions on Mounir's suggestion?

-Giri

-----Original Message-----
From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr] 
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 8:30 AM
To: Mandyam, Giridhar; Tim Volodine; public-geolocation
Cc: Rich Tibbett; Rob Manson
Subject: Re: Proposal to add unit quaternion representation to the Device Orientation event.

Giri, should we investigate adding this to http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ ?

-- Mounir

On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, at 22:43, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote:
> If there are no objections to this proposal provided to the mailing 
> list by 5 PM US Pacific Time, August 1, 2014, then I will request the 
> editors (Tim and Rich) to include this proposal in the DeviceOrientation spec.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Giri
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 3:05 AM
> To: Tim Volodine; public-geolocation
> Cc: Rich Tibbett; Rob Manson; Mandyam, Giridhar
> Subject: Re: Proposal to add unit quaternion representation to the 
> Device Orientation event.
> 
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, at 00:29, Tim Volodine wrote:
> > Proposed interface changes:
> > 
> > [Callback, NoInterfaceObject]
> > interface OrientationQuaternion {
> >   readonly attribute double x;
> >   readonly attribute double y;
> >   readonly attribute double z;
> >   readonly attribute double w;
> > }
> 
> That sounds great! Should we consider adding DOMQuaternion to 
> http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ instead of creating it inside this spec?
> 
> -- Mounir
>

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 15:40:58 UTC