- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:30:12 +1000
- To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>, Tim Volodine <timvolodine@google.com>, "public-geolocation" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
- Cc: Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com>, Rob Manson <roBman@buildar.com>
Giri, should we investigate adding this to
http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ ?
-- Mounir
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, at 22:43, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote:
> If there are no objections to this proposal provided to the mailing list
> by 5 PM US Pacific Time, August 1, 2014, then I will request the editors
> (Tim and Rich) to include this proposal in the DeviceOrientation spec.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Giri
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 3:05 AM
> To: Tim Volodine; public-geolocation
> Cc: Rich Tibbett; Rob Manson; Mandyam, Giridhar
> Subject: Re: Proposal to add unit quaternion representation to the Device
> Orientation event.
>
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, at 00:29, Tim Volodine wrote:
> > Proposed interface changes:
> >
> > [Callback, NoInterfaceObject]
> > interface OrientationQuaternion {
> > readonly attribute double x;
> > readonly attribute double y;
> > readonly attribute double z;
> > readonly attribute double w;
> > }
>
> That sounds great! Should we consider adding DOMQuaternion to
> http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ instead of creating it inside this spec?
>
> -- Mounir
>
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 15:30:36 UTC